Evaluation of comparative efficacy of Guda Sunthi and Manjistha Guggulu Avapeedana Nasya in Manyastambha (Cervical Spondylitis)

  • Dr. Manjunath Akki Professor & Guide, Post Graduate Dept. of Panchakarma, SJG Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital, Koppal, Karnataka, INDIA.
  • Dr. Suresh Hakkandi Professor & HOD, Dept. of Panchakarma, SJG Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital, Koppal, Karnataka, INDIA.
  • Dr. Arti Panwar Post Graduate Scholar, Post Graduate Dept. of Panchakarma, SJG Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital, Koppal, Karnataka, INDIA.
Keywords: Manyastambha, Cervical spondylitis, Avapeedana Nasya

Abstract

Manyastambha is described under Nanatmaja Vatavyadhi. It is a condition where, the aggravated Vata get localized in the Manya Pradesha causing symptoms like Stambha and Shoola. Manyastambha can be compared with earliest symptoms of cervical spondylitis. In this condition, patient complaints of neck pain. The neck is held rigidly and neck movements may exacerbate pain. Now a day, Cervical spondylitis is very common in the people who do routine activities like travelling, household work, desk job etc. It can be seen in people as early as 25 years of age. In Manyastambha, Nasya is the main line of treatment. (i.e. Vatakaphahara Nasya). Objectives: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of Guda Sunthi Avapeedana Nasya and Manjistha Guggulu Avpeedana Nasya in Manyastambha (Cervical Spondylitis). Materials and Methods: This is a comparative clinical study conducted to assess the efficacy in Manyastambha. As per the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients who fulfill the criteria were randomly selected and equally divided into two groups. Group A - 15 Patients received Guda-Sunthi Avapeedana Nasya. Group B - 15 Patients received Manjistha-Guggulu Avapeedana Nasya. Results and Conclusion: In Group A, 9 patients (60%) showed complete remission and 6 patients (30%) showed marked response. In Group B, 3 patients (20%) showed complete remission, 1 patient (7%) showed marked response. 6 patients (30%) showed moderate response, 4 patients (26%) showed mild response and 1 patient (7%) showed unchanged response.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kashinath Shastri, Commentary: Ayurveda Deepika of Chakrapaniadatta on Charaka Samhitha of Charaka, Sutrasthana, chapter 20, verse no. 11, 5th edition, Varanasi: Chaukambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2012; 269

Kashinath Shastri and Gorakhanath Chaturvedi. Charaka Samhitha of Charaka, Chikitsasthana, chapter 28, verse no. 43, Reprint, Varanasi: Chaukambha Bharati Academy: 2001; 784

Ambikadutta Shastri. Sushrutasamhita of Sushruta, Chikitsasthana, chapter 5, verse no. 20, 12th edition, Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthana: 2001; 32

Shrikantha Murthy K R. Sharangadhara Samhita of Sharanghadhara, Uttara Khanda, chapter 8, verse no.2nd edition, Varanasi: Chaukambha Orientalia; 2006, 225.

Rajeev Kumar Rai, Vangasen Samhita of Vangasena, Vatavyadhinidanam, verse no.119, Reprint, Prachya Prakashan; 2010, 26

Anna Moreshwar Kunte and Krishna Ramachandra Shastri Navre. Commentary: Sarvangasundara of Arunadatta and Ayurvedarasayana of Hemadri on Asthangahridaya of Vagbhata, Sutrasthana, verse no. 17, Reprint, Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surabharati Prakashan; 2002, 290.

Anna Moreshwar Kunte and Krishna Ramachandra Shastri Navre. Commentary: Sarvangasundara of Arunadatta and Ayurvedarasayana of Hemadri on Asthangahridaya of Vagbhata, Sutrasthana, verse no. 18,19, Reprint, Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surabharati Prakashan; 2002, 290.

Anna Moreshwar Kunte and Krishna Ramachandra Shastri Navre. Commentary: Sarvangasundara of Arunadatta and Ayurvedarasayana of Hemadri on Asthangahridaya of Vagbhata, Sutrasthana, verse no. 20-22, Reprint, Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surabharati Prakashan; 2002, 290-291.

CITATION
DOI: 10.21760/jaims.v4i02.585
Published: 2019-04-30
How to Cite
Dr. Manjunath Akki, Dr. Suresh Hakkandi, & Dr. Arti Panwar. (2019). Evaluation of comparative efficacy of Guda Sunthi and Manjistha Guggulu Avapeedana Nasya in Manyastambha (Cervical Spondylitis). Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences, 4(02), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.21760/jaims.v4i02.585
Section
Original Article